Sunday, December 28, 2008

Kurt's Compendium of Questioanbly Comedic Quotes

Updated 1/5/08 1:34 AM

Here, I will be posting and updating with the humorous quotes that I find throughout my reading of Slaughterhouse-Five.

“The main thing now was to find the steering wheel. At first, Billy windmilled his arms, hoping to find it by luck. When that didn’t work, he became methodical, working in such a way that the wheel could not possibly escape him. He placed himself hard against the left-hand door, searched every square inch of the area before him. When he failed to find the wheel, he moved over six inches, and searched again. Amazingly, he was eventually hard against the right-hand door, without having found the wheel. He concluded that somebody had stolen it. This angered him as he passed out.

He was in the back seat of his car, which was why he couldn’t find the steering wheel.” (47)

Just as a sort of explanation here, the context is that Billy is drunk. Very drunk. Vonnegut's description goes into excessive detail, but does so for comedic value rather than to support the story or the setting. I know that Mr. Walsh once said that all of his own jokes follow the format of a big lead up followed by a single, short punch line. That seems to be the case with this scene as well.

"Billy Pilgrim padded downstairs on his blue and ivory feet. He went into the kitchen, where the moonlight called his attention to a half bottle of champagne on the kitchen table, all that was left from the reception in the tent. Somebody had stoppered it again. 'Drink me,' it seemed to say.

So Billy uncorked it with his thumbs. It didn't make a pop. The champagne was dead. So it goes." (73)

As I stated in my previous entry, whenever someone dies in Slaughterhouse-Five, Vonnegut writes the Tralfamadorian saying "So it goes." Therefore, the previous 72 1/2 pages of the book served as a comedic build up to this scene, where the champagne was dead. I feel that this exemplifies not just something funny, but Vonnegut himself, in that it is a particular and uniquely dry joke. I also love how the champagne is personified to add to the ridiculousness of the scene. (Wow, I can't believe ridiculousness is a real word)

"On the eighth day, the forty-year-old hobo said to Billy, 'This ain't so bad. I can be comfortable anywhere.'

'You can?' said Billy.

On the ninth day, the hobo died. So it goes. His last words were, 'You think this is bad? This ain't bad.'" (79)

I'm not sure whether this scene was intended to be funny, or just ironic, but I found it a bit of both. Throughout the long and cramped train ride to the POW camp, this hobo has been explaining to all of the soldiers that the trip wasn't so bad. Well, so it goes.

"Billy coughed when the door was opened, and when he coughed he shit thin gruel. This was in accordance with the Third Law of Motion according to Sir Isaac Newton. This law tells us that for every action there is a reaction which is equal and opposite in direction.

This can be useful in rocketry." (80)

While this quote seems a bit simple and scatological, I'm including it as a representation of Vonnegut's versatility in using humor. Thus far, the humorous passages have ranged from simple jokes (such as this) to more intelligent ones (the irony and juxtaposition of the hobo's death) to nuances (such as the wine). However, even in the case of a "poop joke," Vonnegut displays his understanding for what makes the joke funny by adding in Newton's Third Law of Motion. Even when he is being stupid, he's being smart.

"They were among the wealthiest people in Europe, in terms of food. A clerical mistake early in the war, when food was still getting through to prisoners, had caused the Red Cross to ship them five hundred parcels every month instead of fifty. The Englishmen had hoarded these so cunningly that now, as the war was ending, they had three tons of sugar, one ton of coffee, eleven hundred pounts of chocolate, seven hundred pounds of tobacco, seventeen hundred poinds of tea, two tons of flour, one ton of canned beef, twelve hundred pounds of canned butter, sixteen hundred pounds of canned cheese, eight hundred pounds of powdered milk, and two tons of orange marmalade." (94)

Another case that is more subtle and ironic than laugh-out-loud funny. As a note for my readers (assuming you've actually survived this far into my entry), These Englishmen are prisoners. Billy and the other POWs are sent to this "prison" after the awful train ride, and are greeted with excess supplies and "goodie bags" containing razors, chocolate, cigars, soap, matches, a pencil, and a candle. I just love how rediculous how nice the "prison" is.


"There was a lot that Billy said that was gibberish to the Tralfamadorians, too. They couldn't imagine what time looked like to him. Billy had
given up on explaining that. The guide outside had to explain as best he could.

The guide invited the crowd to imagine that they were looking across a desert at a mountain range on a day that was twinkling bright and clear. They could look at a peak or a bird or a cloud, at a stone right in front of them, or even down into a canyon behind them. But among them was this poor Earthling, and his head was encased in a
steel sphere which he could never take off. There was only one eyehole through which he could look, and welded to that eyehole were six feet of pipe.

This was only the beginning of Billy's miseries in the metaphor. He was also strapped to a steel lattice which was bolted to a flatcar on rails, and t
here was no way he could turn his head or touch the pipe. The far end of the pipe rested on a bi-pod which was also bolted to the flatcar. All Billy could see was the little dot at the end of the pipe. he didn't know he was on a flatcar, didn't even know there was anything peculiar about his situation.

The flatcar sometimes crept, sometimes went extremely fast, often stopped - went uphill, downhill, around curves, along straightaways. Whatever poor Billy saw through the pipe, he had no choice but to say to himself, 'That's life.'" (11
5)


I think the best part of this is the excessive detail that the Tralfamadorian goes into. Vonnegut even acknowledges it with the first sentence of the third paragraph. It's also interesting, because I personally find it difficult to imagine how anyone would be able to discern anything when seeing in the fourth dimension. Perhaps this outlook represents the natural impulses of people to feel better than those who they do not understand. This has been proven in the past, and was a significant factor in the start of World War II, in fact. When I think of the 4th dimension, while I'd be able to look at a single pebble on the ground, or a bird in the sky, a Tralfamadorian would only be able to see a blurry line of the entire bird's life: everywhere it's ever been, everything it has ever done. I feel like my way of seeing things would be much better.


"Somebody in the zoo crowd asked him through the lecturer what the most valuable thing he had learned on Tralfamadore was so far, and Billy replied, 'How the inhabitants of a whole planet can live in peace! As you know, I am from a planet that has been engaged in senseless slaughter since the beginning of time. I myself have seen the bodies of schoolgirls who were boiled alive in a water tower by my own countrymen, who were proud of fighting pur evel at the time.' This was true. Billy saw the boiled bodies in Dresden. 'And I have lit my own way in a prison at night with candles from the fat of human beings who were butchered by the brothers and fathers of those schoolgirls who are boiled. Earthlings must be the terrors of the Universe! If other planets aren't now in danger from earth, they soon will be. So tell me the secret so I can take it back to Earth and save us all: How can a planet live in peace?'

Billy felt that he had spoken soaringly. He was b
affled when he saw the Tralfamadorians close their little hands on their eyes. He knew from past experience what this meant: He was being stupid.

'Would - would you mind telling me -' he said to the guide, much deflated, 'what was so stupid about that?'


'We know how the Universe ends -' said the guide, 'and Earth has nothing to do with it, except that it gets wiped out, too.'


'How - how does the Universe end?' said Billy.

'We blow it up, experimenting with new fuels for our flying saucers. A Tralfamadorian test pilot presses a starter button, and the whole Universe disappears.' So it goes." (116-117)


An interesting thought to consider, indeed, for someone who can see all of time. what I find so fascinating about the Tralfamadorians is that questions about the Universe itself aren't even worth answering for them, while a simple human is enlightening to observe. Perhaps this scene (and the zoo as a whole) are trying to say that it's important to focus on and appreciate the present because:
1. You don't know what life will have in store for you, and
2. Even if you do, what good will it do looking to the future when you're in the present?


"A crazy thought now occurred to Billy. The truth of it startled him. It would make a good epitath for Billy Pilgrim - and for me, too.

[On the following page]



The random insertion of the idea in the first place is rather entertaining, but the real killer is having the entire thing written out on the picture of the tombstone. In all honesty, I feared that I would neer find out what the epitath would be. Unfortunately, there is no explination of why the epitath is amazing and perfect, and I'm personally having trouble figuring it out myself. I can tell that it's one of Vonnegut's signature humorous shots at a political or human idea, but I can't really discern what that is.


"Billy, curled in his azure nest, found himself staring at Cinderella's silver boots under a throne. And then he remembered that his shoes were ruined, that he needed boots. He hated to get out of his nest, but he forced himself to do it. He crawled to the boots on all fours, sat, tried them on.

The boots fit perfectly. Billy Pilgrim was Cinderella, and Cinderella was Billy Pilgrim." (145)


The last sentence is quite amusing, but thi scene leads to a later scene in which the Americans look like the most pathetic and uselss bunch of men ever. One of them has a broken arm, another is far older than any traditional soldier, and Billy Pilgrim is wearing silver boots, is draped in an azure curtain, and has his hands wrapped in a fluffy, furry coat.


"You lads are leaving this afternoon for Dresden - a beautiful city, I'm told. You won't be cooped up like us. You'll be out where the life is, and the food is ceartain to be more plentiful than here. If I may inject a personal note: It has been five years now since I have seen a tree or flower or woman or child - or a dog or a cat or a place of entertainment, or a human being doing useful work of any kind.

"You needn't worry about bombs, by the way. Dresden is an open city. it is undefended, and contains no war industries or troop concentratiosn of any importance." (146)


The dramatic irony of this scene just kills the reader. Firstly, I already know that Dresden will be firebombed, everyone does. But the last paragraph is the icing on the cake. It's the line in a movie that, if it went unsaid, would mean Dresden would be perfectly fine. But saying "Something terrible and unlikely will definately not happen, by the way." almost assures the reader/viewer that it will. The excessive detail exaggerates the idea to the point that any reader should be able to pick up on it. Fun, smart, and entertaining.


DONE FOR NOW.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Update coming soon

Sorry for not updating yesterday, as I was supposed to. I've been having some pretty serious computer issues, so it's been hard to get internet access at home (my mom uses her computer for work).

Hopefully I'll be able to update later tonight, but if not, I will find some time over the next couple of days to make a post.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

An Introduction to Vonnegut: My First Real Post

So here it is. 11:05, the day the first real blog entry is due. Yep, I feel right at home. After all, this is an AP class.

For those who don't know anything about Slaughterhouse-Five, the premise is that this guy, Billy Pilgrim, suddenly becomes "unstuck in time."

When I first read that, I thought it was a fascinating interpretation of the idea. Being "unstuck" is so much different from time traveling. Traveling gives several implications: that it is controlled, that it is intentional, and that it is between two predetermined points. Becoming "unstuck in time," on the other hand, opens up a world of possibilities. Firstly, since it is a negative of being "stuck in time", it implies that everyone else is "stuck." And being "unstuck" opens up so many possibilities. It is freely moving between every moment of one's life.

But that brings up several issues that I think will be important to the book. How much of our life value is based on linearity? What significance do cause and effect have when one is free to move about time? I could propose to the woman I love one day and wake up a twelve year old boy the next. Unless, of course, I proposed to the girl I loved when I was a twelve year old boy...

And then other matters arise. What does death mean? I see it as being a closed door. You are still free to move about all of the rooms you've currently explored in the house, but that door, the future, will forever be closed.

One passage stood out to me in particular:

"GOD GRANT ME
THE SERENITY TO ACCEPT
THE THINGS I CANNOT CHANGE,
COURAGE
TO CHANGE THE THINGS I CAN,
AND WISDOM ALWAYS
TO TELL THE
DIFFERENCE.

Among the things Billy Pilgrim could not change were the past, the present, and the future."

Time travel without being able to change time. It is, essentially, just seeing the 4th dimension; a constant stream of who one is, from birth to death. But, while the past and the future are things to expect to be unchangable, the surprising mention is that Billy cannot change the present.

And so now I am left wondering how Vonnegut views time. Are our lives linear and predetermined, with the only difference being that some people live it from birth to death and others live it in a random order? It remind me of a book I planned to read, The Time Traveler's Wife, with a similar premise about a man who randomly moves throughout time.

Regardless, I think that this idea of fate will play a major role in the story, particularly when one considers that the context is the firebombing of Dresden (which, for those who don't know, killed more people than Hiroshima). Any moment of significant death or mass death in a story always brings to mind the possibility of preventing it. I really love these moments when moral and ethical philosophy meet theoretical science fiction. It makes me giddy. =D

I could keep talking for hours, but I think my post is already quite long, and I'm not sure how much it will really help me out in the long run, but it was fun to write.

And now it's 11:25. A linear progression from beginning of blog to end. Because, after all, I'm just stuck in time.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

My point exactly





A sample of Kurt Vonnegut's humor. =D

So it goes...

Going into a nonfiction author research project, I had some doubts. Everyone that Mr. Walsh reccomended seemed like some sort of weird old person. So I look at the first name, Christopher Hitchens. He seemed cool (a pro-war athiest) And then I read the title of his most recent book: God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Perhaps he is a little too radical for me.

And as I made my way down the list, I found Kurt Vonnegut. This guy seemed more of my style. A mix of fiction and nonfiction, time travel, humor, and a distinctly humanist outlook. But he was the fourth person down on the list. What if any of the first three were better choices? Surely a fourth place author couldn't be that good.

So what happens if Vonnegut is no good? In short: tough luck.

In long: tttttttttttooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuugghhh lllllluuuuuuuuuuuuuucccccccckkkkkkkk.

But, unlike my DJs, I'm not going to write this pretending I haven't already read ahead so I can make predictions that will give me more content to respond to in future DJs.

No, I'm 60 pages in and so far, I love him. =]

I appologize for writing so long, but all of this information seems quite relevent. To me. So what about you?

In short: tough luck.

In long...